• Home
  • About
  • Comments policy
  • Contact
  • My fans

Trial by Jeory

Watching the world of east London politics

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Descent into the lawless Wild West
Respect takes Spitalfields seat »

Councillor waste

December 13, 2010 by trialbyjeory

A kind reader has sent me this link to an FoI request that’s just been disclosed by Tower Hamlets council. Actually, there was no need to FoI it as it is a public document, but all the same, I think it will make interesting reading for most people.

It’s a list of the Special Responsibility Allowances paid to Mayor Lutfur Rahman and 24 councillors. That means almost half our 52 elected representatives are being paid over and above the £10,065 they get as basic councillor pay. And that’s before Lutfur, if he finally manages it, fills another few members of his cabinet at £13,325 a go.

Some of these positions, such as the chairs of the Development Committee (Cllr Carli Harper-Penman) and Overview and Scrutiny (Cllr Ann Jackson), do involve a fair amount of work, but whether an extra £10,710 is the right amount, I don’t know.

Other positions attracting serious pocket money defy belief. Take the General Purposes Committee, for example. Its chair, Cllr Helal Uddin of Bromley-by-Bow, trousers almost an extra annual £8,000 for presiding over a few hours extra work a year, if that. Check out this link and you’ll see there has only been three meetings this financial year. In total, there have been four agenda items, all of which were simple rubber stamp reports such as agreeing the terribly crucial appointments to the Billingsgate Market Consultative Advisory Committee. I once sat in one of these meetings to see exactly what went on and the answer was pretty much nothing. The councillors usually arrive late, the officers (who claim the evening sessions as lieu time) sip tea and nibble biscuits, and then the meeting is usually over within a matter of minutes.

Then there is Mizanur Chaudhury who get £5,800 for being an “Olympics Ambassador”. What?? Why?? Shouldn’t he be doing whatever he does for free, just for the pure privilege?

That there are so many paid positions is a corruption of our system. They are the paid vote. Some 500 council staff will soon lose their jobs. Many of these payments should also go. Given that most of the recipients are Labour members, Mayor Rahman, who while council leader was the worst offender for paying his mates, might well propose such a move.

Councillors wouldn’t dare squeal if that happened. Not even Tower Hamlets councillors…or would they?

Share this: Facebook & Twitter

  • Share
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | 42 Comments

42 Responses

  1. on December 13, 2010 at 11:16 pm carole

    Ted how comes you were never interested in how much Christeen Gilbert awarded herself and the Michael Kieth and of course Maureen Mcelenney and her team they were on saleries with a few extra zeros
    So £10.000 really does not make such a good story jet some juicy news out there not silly little FOI that others have passed on to you
    Perhaps a bigger story should be WHY is it that Oona King can now recieve more than £6.000 upwards per month just to sign her name
    When the people of Bethnal Green and Bow regected her and even the Labour party did not want her perhaps that would be a far better story for you to cover
    And so much more interesting


    • on December 13, 2010 at 11:23 pm trialbyjeory

      Oh come now, Carole, was my previous writing and hard work so wasted on you? I remember clearly the days when you used to sing my praises for doing exactly what you said I didn’t. I frequently criticised the fat cat salaries of Christine and Maureen and council leaders.
      What I also clearly remember is you criticising councillors for being paid for doing virtually nothing…so why the change of heart?
      And if you read the post properly, you’ll see that my argument is more than a point about finance…


  2. on December 14, 2010 at 12:16 am Judoker

    It’s appropriate to look hard at cllrs allowances on the current climate and with the brutal cuts the Lib-Con govt are making to east London councils. That said, it’s an easy pop to have a go at cllrs allowances – it’s an emotionally draining job which f&@ks up your life and job prospects.


    • on December 16, 2010 at 8:46 pm AMD

      I’m sure like many jobs there is an element of emotional drain but ffs they DO have a choice about going into the role of councillor.


  3. on December 14, 2010 at 12:57 am Taj Miah

    So we are paying over a £1million pounds (once the mayors recruited the rest of his cabinet, advisors, iphones, ect) of our hard earned money for a bunch of monkeys to hurl insults at each other and fight to climb the political food chain….hmmm….not sure what happened to the notion of ‘pay peanuts, u get monkeys’, cos it seems we are paying their weight in gold and still getting monkeys.

    Wonder how many teachers, school support assistants, social workers, pensioners luncheon clubs, refurbished properties that money can buy each year.


  4. on December 14, 2010 at 1:01 am Taj Miah

    Shocking that Abbas, who spoke only once, maybe twice for a minute or 2 each time at the last 2 council meeting and has no real responsibility of services/departments/portfolios gets an extra £13,325. SHOCKING!!!!


  5. on December 14, 2010 at 8:08 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    Spot on Ted. However, as with much of your work where you sometime incoherently mix things to spice up a story, please state at the top…”Mayor LR and 24 councillors ‘of which 20 are Labour’…”, otherwise many would assume that he is responsible for this unless they can differentiate by reading the bottom part of your article. The solution to the SRA problem is simple: half the payments. Cllr Carli Harpa Penman (who apparently got nearly £10,000 basic plus over£8,000 for attending just 6 licensing 1-2 hour meetings as its chair according to the council’s records for last year) should get a maximum of £5,000 and as chair of Development Committee that money could come from the Section 106 pot. It’s reasonable to say O&S reps also get, say, a maximum of £5,000 in addition to the £10,000. That’s still £600-700 per meeting just for asking questions, which they should be doing anyway. General Purposes and Olympics Ambassador should be abolished by the mayor immediately which could pay for and save a council job, say admin, at £14,000). Cabinet members (and deputy mayor for going on jollies) should only get £10,000 on top of their basic £10,000, which still gives them an earning of a £1,000 per cabinet meeting they attend (plus the £1k more for talking nonsense at meetings with below ESOL level English). Perks like free boroughwide parking permits which isn’t stated above should also be abolished. These cuts could save quite a few jobs. Labour councillors must welcome any such motion by the otherwise manipulative and ultra-cunning Mayor Rahman.


    • on December 14, 2010 at 11:00 pm Judoker

      Dont think they get perks.


  6. on December 14, 2010 at 8:25 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    Additionally, opposition leaders’ allowances should be capped at £5000 too because that’s what they’re in politics for anyway if they are unable to attain power and as they aren’t responsible or accountable for delivery. The deputy chair’s £4,000 for nearly doing nothing should be abolished too. That money could be used to upgrade the council’s uninteractive website or on hi-tech webcams as someone mentioned in your earlier blog!


  7. on December 14, 2010 at 10:42 am You couldn't make it up!

    I wonder how many of the current councillors we would still have if the Council abolished ALL councillor allowances – including that of the Mayor.

    Now there’s a thought – and a possible vote winner at that!

    Tell me Ted – just how much does the Council spend each year on payments to Councillors for allowances, jollies, iphones, free parking permits and the like?

    Let’s start translating that into real frontline services when we start hearing what’s going to get cut!


  8. on December 14, 2010 at 11:33 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    I hope Mayor Rahman’s negative association with iPhones makes cllrs feel guilty about ordering them! There should be a TH CSR on iPhones, laptops, SRAs, allowance and perks like £2000 per cllr 4 year boroughwide parking permits!


  9. on December 14, 2010 at 11:54 am shahanara

    I know all too well of councillors absenteeism and lateness at meetings. I also know of the councillors who are repeat offenders in this regard. I have raised it outside of meetings but no one wants to take any action. I don’t think they can. At Tower Hamlets Homes Board we publish quarterly attendance graphs and the councillors regularly have the worst attendance.


  10. on December 14, 2010 at 12:01 pm You couldn't make it up

    You should try checking their timesheets sometime to see how they spend their time and just how many hours each month they actually spend on cases relating to constituents they deal with each month.

    Or maybe I should say how few hours?

    The timesheets are available on the page for every councillor – just click the link on this page to find the ones for your councillor

    http://sps2ksrv.towerhamlets.gov.uk/meetYourCouncillor/


  11. on December 14, 2010 at 1:00 pm Fighting4EdMiliband

    Since most cllrs are Labour, the party shouldn’t have chosen (imposed!) candidates that had attendance issues. But I doubt that was the criteria as I suspect it might have been nepotism and factionalism that determined their candidature by the London Labour Party’s stupid egotistical monkey-mafia boss, Kenneth Clarke, who some say is apparently regarded by Bengali Labour councillors in a ‘master and slaves’ relationship. And the reason he didn’t want Lutfur Rahman as mayoral candidate is because Mr Clark would lose control over the ‘slavish’ councillors. Perhaps someone can enlighten us on the real power structure in Tower Hamlets, I mean who exactly do Labour members need to appease in order to become a ‘profession slave’?!


  12. on December 14, 2010 at 1:22 pm Mike Law

    Obviously, he’s following the example of Wales in Newham.


  13. on December 14, 2010 at 1:26 pm Mike Law

    I take that back. At least there’s no councillors on an extra £30k a year as there are in Newham; but then, Lutfur doesn’t have any personal friends on the council as far as I’m aware.


  14. on December 15, 2010 at 1:47 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    Funny how the Spitalfields by-election tomorrow isn’t gaining any coverage on this blog. Is it because Labour will lose? Surely, bloggers would love to have talked about it here!


    • on December 15, 2010 at 7:34 am You couldn't make it up!

      Like I said earlier – you’re obviously badly in need of a blog of your own so you can talk about the things YOU want to talk about.

      Speaking personally I’m not in the least interested in the outcome of the Spitalfields by-election. Politics in that part of the borough seems to be a complete farce from beginning to end – and that’s not a farce which makes me laugh.

      Is the by-election getting any coverage anywhere?

      [went to have look] Not a lot! Having said that, Maggie Crosbie the Green candidate looks like an interesting alternative – see http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/greens_name_spitalfields_and_banglatown_by_election_candidate_1_746567

      Now – just for a change – why don’t we focus on a political party which is not mired in a mess in Tower Hamlets?


  15. on December 15, 2010 at 9:32 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    And what exactly are you doing then talking about the Greens on a thread like this? Isn’t Spitalfields part of Tower Hamlets no more? I am loyal to Ted’s blog and do not have competitive thinking over virtual domination. I’m still waiting for your response on why you think it is OK for a male, elected politician in the UK to change their surname without a valid reason, just give me an example of just one other Labour politician! Don’t get off Google til you have news. I don’t care if you’re interested in SBT or not, ur choice, just don’t try to be patronising.


    • on December 15, 2010 at 10:01 am You couldn't make it up!

      Well you were completely off topic (you didn’t notice?) so I thought I would go off topic too! <i?(funny how you noticed that!)

      I just thought it would be really nice to extend the horizons of those reading this blog to the fact that there are in fact real alternatives in the by-election – ones who are NOT tainted by those who have made such a mess of things so far

      We don’t often get a choice of a Green Candidate for Councillor in Tower Hamlets so I thought it was worth highlighting.


  16. on December 15, 2010 at 10:45 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    Cool TMG! Please ask Greens to campaign for retention of green lands in TH, as they’ve done little to prevent construction, eg Furze Green E3.


    • on December 15, 2010 at 11:09 am You couldn't make it up!

      Dearie me – got your accountabilities in a twist haven’t you!

      It’s the Councillors who run the Council who have done little to prevent construction on the green space in Tower Hamlets.

      Why don’t you ask the Councillors of the Strategic Development Committee in the last administration and this one about their voting credentials on over development / developments on green space?

      Look around Tower Hamlets and you’ll find local community groups everywhere who are campaigning to save their green spaces and protect their communities.

      But Councillors in Tower Hamlets don’t have a great track record at getting out and listening to the community groups do they? Some of them are also pretty partial as to just who they listen to – witness how all the people living around Victoria Park were ignored last summer.

      In fact quite a few of the Councillors don’t do much of anything.

      Returning to topic(!) – maybe we should start looking at how little some of the current Councillors actually do?


      • on December 15, 2010 at 2:44 pm anon

        Think the councillors did do something about the Victoria Park festival overload. They highlighted a 7 year standing problem with events in the park. See the ELA article, July 15 2010:

        “ANGRY residents living beside Victoria Park say the summer’s music festivals are making their lives a misery…

        They have been complaining to Tower Hamlets council’s environmental health officers for the past seven years but fear the problems could get even worse as the park gets ready to host three weekends of live music in a row….

        This month Victoria Park will be hosting the three-night Lovebox weekender, followed by the two-night High Voltage festival and then another three-night event for the Field Day Concert.

        In August there is the dance LED festival and then the Underage Festival.

        Bow East ward councillor Marc Francis said: “It is evident that the major events team views Victoria Park as little more than a cash cow that can be milked mercilessly to deliver an outcome for the council.

        “The grotesque exploitation of Victoria Park is an absolute scandal.”

        But council bosses insist that the money raised by staging the festivals pays for “popular free community events”, including Paradise Gardens and the November firework display, and that the influx of party-goers into the borough boosts businesses.

        A spokeswoman said: “We understand that for some residents, large-scale events in Victoria Park can be disruptive and we do everything we can to minimise this.

        “This includes having additional officers working to make sure the festivals are running well, licensing conditions are met and noise levels are monitored throughout.”

        So you can see that councillors did try to represent communities affected by this growing problem.

        Seems that the LBTH Arts & Events Team (in Hanbury Street but under the Communities, Localities and Culture Directorate) control the contracts dished out to the commercial sector. These are very lucrative and the LBTH team justify ‘intensifying’ the use of the park for commercial events by saying these underwrite the grant funded community events (peanuts as compared Lovebox, Field Day etc) like Paradise Gardens etc.

        It does seem odd though that Licensing do not get involved which is where Councillors might have got to have a say/represent the community. Were the LBTH Arts and Events Team allowed to increase Lovebox to three days without having to put this (increased) application before any Committee (Licensing? Planning?)

        Can it be true that it is officers on the LBTH Arts and Events Team in total control of the decisions made to hire out the park for these commercial events and no councillor has a say/or any involvement? If anyone knows (around the park): are LBTH Licensing Committees or Planning Committees, ie, Councillors involved? This year – or for the past 7 years?


  17. on December 15, 2010 at 4:31 pm Joe

    I’m aware of going off topic but we do get Licence Notices for events in Victoria Park.

    However there is the issue of LBTH being co-promotor (LBTH’s name on posters as sponsor), licensing authority, landlord and in charge of the heath & safety / noise nuisance issues, it just feels we are powerless.

    I think next year more of us may object but it feels pointless. I was informed Judicial Review is one way forward but of the groups it may be possible for none have the funds to make it happen, that I am aware of.


    • on December 15, 2010 at 6:02 pm anon

      Joe, this isn’t off-topic as we are trying to fathom out our Councillors’ roles in this. They sit on these Committees and get paid for it (as Ted shows above), so we residents are not going off-topic, if Councillors were involved in the decisions re park events.

      So, when you objected, were your objections put before the Licensing Committee? If so, which one, (date etc.) so we can see which Councillors ignored the objections?

      Agree, it feels useless objecting in this borough, particularly when LBTH are the authority in all depts…and making the mega-bucks from the park contracts. Back on topic though, if Councillors on a Licensing(?) Committee did ignore you earlier this year (and the previous 7 years?), then that is actually worse than “Councillor Waste” as they take the Allowances to then ignore residents.


  18. on December 15, 2010 at 5:09 pm Fighting4EdMiliband

    Now then, coming back to the topic of Councillor Waste tomorrow’s by-election in Spitalfields and so called BengaliTown will have cost taxpayers nearly £20,000 excluding potential policing. But the real cost will be borne by Tower Hamlets Labour because it will not only lose a symbolic seat but also face in the borough. Having said that people lacking any sense of shame (or its cognitive faculty!) wouldn’t find losing face as an issue. December 16 is apparently Bangladesh’s national independence day. THLP should have given Bangladeshi (and non Bangladeshi) ward party members the independence to select their own candidate instead of imposing Abul Aleem against the wishes of people like Mussabeer Ali, chair of the Spitalfields Labour Party, who has been quoted in Peter Kenyon’s blog as asking “Who is this unknown candidate?”! Labour’s arrogant self appointed bosses in Tower Hamlets should get ready for a sleepless electoral post mortem weekend and bang their heads for recreating a Respect victory. Respect’s popular ex-councillor Fazlol Miah will be the clear winner tomorrow for giving voters independence from Labour’s shackles of self-delusion. We should all ask ourselves why white residents in Spitalfields are NOT campaigning for Labour at all. Insomnia for THLP…


  19. on December 15, 2010 at 7:29 pm Joe

    @ Anon: I haven’t objected but I’m told people have and they have been allowed to speak at the meeting then ignored.


    • on December 15, 2010 at 8:39 pm anon

      Do you remember the date of this Committee Meeting? Was it a Licensing Committee meeting? Planning Committee meeting? (Councillors and officers would have been in attendance – and all paid allowances – so still on topic!)


      • on December 15, 2010 at 8:48 pm Joe

        Sorry I don’t know the details, I was told at a meeting last year about the park.


  20. on December 16, 2010 at 2:08 am Robin

    All senior management of the council, plus all the councillors should take a 15% pay cut for the next two years to offset some of the cuts that the council need to make.

    Will they though. No. The greedy bastards.


  21. on December 16, 2010 at 4:08 pm Fighting4EdMiliband

    Not looking particularly good in Spitalfields today. I wonder why? Preparations for a post mortem could be under way as some people will be expected to give answers. Or get fired!


  22. on December 16, 2010 at 7:15 pm Not Shanara (still Bill)

    Dan McCurry|Fighting4EdMiliband: “strawman sockpuppet”.


  23. on December 16, 2010 at 11:13 pm Fighting4EdMiliband

    Ted has suddenly vanished following the publishing of this thread on Councillor’s allowances. It is not yet know whether he will return with the S&BT by election result or a bunch of pear-shaped bananas…


  24. on December 16, 2010 at 11:36 pm Fighting4EdMiliband

    The atmosphere at the count is tense…


  25. on December 17, 2010 at 12:03 am Fighting4EdMiliband

    Insomnia for top brass Labour idiots for failing to snatch a golden seat. 2 Fast 2 Furious.


  26. on December 17, 2010 at 10:40 pm shahanara

    I’m shahanara, not Bill, what’s your comment supposed to mean???


  27. on December 17, 2010 at 10:58 pm shahanara

    Cllrs have gone to THH staff to moan about my previous post regarding cllr absenteeism and punctuality. Poor babies it transpires I have hurt their feelings. Well at least they were nice and warm in their homes when I trudged in deep snow for the board inspection and pre inspection, just one cllr agreed to come.

    I joined THH Board because I wanted to bring positive change to the most fundamental of peoples needs: housing. I don’t get paid a bean for volunteering my time for the board unlike the cllrs. I do it because I care.

    I have many responsibilities yet strive to attend all meetings and events organised. It is not fair on the rest of the team if some do not pull their weight, particularly if your paid for the privelege.

    We had one very effective cllr who was not selected this time round for the THH Board. Far be it from me to accuse TH politicians of nepotism and favouritism but the decision to not re appoint a competent cllr was very odd.


    • on December 17, 2010 at 11:43 pm trialbyjeory

      Shahanara, which councillors have been absent from THH board meetings and from LAP 1? Thanks, Ted


  28. on December 17, 2010 at 11:01 pm shahanara

    Also at the last LAP 1 meeting 4 out of 9 cllrs turned up. this is not unusual.


  29. on December 18, 2010 at 1:31 am Verdi

    We also need to keep a record of councillor attendence of their surgeries.

    I know of one serving councillor that had not done a single surgery after more than 3 months of being elected.


    • on December 18, 2010 at 1:24 pm You couldn't make it up!

      What do his/her timesheets on the website for the last three months say about holding surgeries?


  30. on December 19, 2010 at 12:26 pm shahanara

    i will not comment on THH at this sensitive time. At the last LAP 1 meeting in attendance were cllrs bill, rofique, kabir and stephanie. it was unusual for Cllr amy not to attend, she almost always does.



Comments are closed.

  • Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - London
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 6,448 other followers

  • Latest Tweets

    • RT @StopCityAirport: How have Crossrail let this happen????? They have started to unveil the 2km-long wall mural across Silvertown. They h… 6 days ago
    • @barnabypace Yep, carbons back on. Spring has arrived! 1 week ago
    • Not on my bike ride yesterday through the Essex lanes, they weren’t. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi… https://t.co/qvgKPEKrJR 1 week ago
    Follow @tedjeory
  • Recent Comments

    taj on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Jay Kay on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Cllr Andrew Wood, Ca… on Election Day: an open thread 
    Abdul Hai on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
  • Archives

  • December 2010
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
    « Nov   Jan »
  • Blogroll

    • Blood and Property
    • Dave Hill's Guardian blog
    • David Osler
    • Designed for Life
    • Diamond Geezer
    • Ealing Rose
    • Emdad Rahman's Blog
    • Hackney Wick Blog
    • Harry's Place
    • Mayor Lutfur Rahman
    • Mile End Residents' Association
    • Richard Osley's blog
    • Spitalfields Life
    • The Bow Bell
    • The Londonist
    • Tower Hamlets – it's your money
    • Tower Hamlets Watch

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
    %d bloggers like this: