• Home
  • About
  • Comments policy
  • Contact
  • My fans

Trial by Jeory

Watching the world of east London politics

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Election fraud: ostriches spotted in Tower Hamlets
The Battle of the Big Guns »

Watergate at Mulberry Place?

April 3, 2013 by trialbyjeory

The Tower Hamlets Labour group has just released the following press release (I’m waiting for a statement from the council):

Labour councillors are pressing for an investigation after a break-in attempt on the Leader of the Labour Group’s office last month after the lock was found jammed following an attempt to force the door.
 
The incident occurred over the weekend of the 9th and 10th March, only days after the Council’s Budget was amended by Labour councillors. Had access been gained many of the Labour Leader’s confidential documents would have been accessible, including budget plans and constituent casework.
 
The office is located on the 1st Floor of the Town Hall in an area restricted to the Mayor and councillors and their staff as well as senior Council officers raising concerns that whoever attempted to access the office may also have managed to gain access to a restricted area on the 1st floor.
 
Leader of the Labour Group, Cllr Joshua Peck, said: “I have written to the Council’s Chief Officer to request that a full investigation is undertaken and that the attempted break in is reported to the police.
 
“This is not the first time politicians’ offices have seen break-in attempts. The Council must take steps to protect councillors’ offices and make sure nobody has access who shouldn’t.”

UPDATE, April 3…5.20pm

The council has just told me there is no CCTV in that part of the town hall and that there is no “conclusive evidence” of a break-in. As such, they say the police will not be called. Here’s the council’s statement:

“An investigation has been completed and no conclusive evidence was found to confirm that a break-in had been attempted. The door was unopened but the lock could not be used and has now been replaced. We are currently considering options as to how security, in that particular part of the building, might be improved.”

This is becoming a familiar refrain!

Share this: Facebook & Twitter

  • Share
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | 32 Comments

32 Responses

  1. on April 3, 2013 at 1:21 pm Tim

    There’s a lot between the lines here. I guess it isn’t being spelled out for a reason …


  2. on April 3, 2013 at 1:29 pm Dan McCurry

    Weird. Anyone else would call the police. Josh writes a letter.


  3. on April 3, 2013 at 1:49 pm oldford1

    This is cheap.

    The whole ‘restricted area’ line is clearly intended to imply that the Mayor or a councillor tried to break in.

    Does anyone really believe that the Mayor, or ANY ONE of the 51 councillors, would actually be STUPID enough to do that? Really?

    I’m pretty sure the whole place is covered in CCTV anyway.

    I hope Josh didn’t gleefully fire this off without talking to colleagues … it will be a bit embarrassing if the CCTV shows some poor old Labour group councillor who forgot their pass on going in to catch up on some casework at the weekend.

    (The Press Release is also inaccurate: Josh doesn’t have an office. There’s a big Labour group room with half a dozen computers, and then a little office where the Political Assistant, David Courcoux, sits.)


    • on April 3, 2013 at 1:55 pm trialbyjeory

      Councillors being “stupid”*? Nah, no one would believe that.

      *thinks of taxis.


      • on April 3, 2013 at 6:13 pm Grave Maurice

        We had councillors threatening to kill one another in the council chamber, councillors claiming housing benefit under false names for council homes they were subletting, and councillors with forty people all living in their front room who were all voting for them in proxy votes… stupid? Downright criminal.


      • on April 4, 2013 at 9:39 am oldford1

        The whole thing is totally and utterly absurd.

        Stealing the budget documents AFTER the budget? What?

        Anyway, the Labour group is so hopelessly divided they’d never in a million years keep anything sensitive in there.


  4. on April 3, 2013 at 1:55 pm JohnJee (@johnjee1966)

    Dan in fairness to Josh, I wouldn’t call the police if it was my workplace -I’d probably report it to “the powers that be” or get internally disciplined if I did call the police myself! Obviously it isn’t Josh’s workplace, but neither is it his home. I would have thought LBTH security would deal with it in the first place and then, if necessary, get the police involved.

    On a similar theme, regarding confidentiality and privacy, I’ve noticed that all the toriy councillors use @gmail.com email addresses rather than the @towerhamlets.gov.uk ones (according to the EEL councilors listings). Is this because they suspect the council emails aren’t secure?


    • on April 3, 2013 at 5:33 pm David Boothroyd

      It may also be a matter of not wanting to use council facilities for party political activities. Also there is a potential for FOI disclosures if councillor email is on a council IT system.

      Westminster council decided in 2006 that councillors should not have an email inbox but instead use private email accounts to receive mail.


      • on April 3, 2013 at 9:21 pm JohnJee (@johnjee1966)

        Thanks David. We live and learn. (Well some of us anyway).


  5. on April 3, 2013 at 11:39 pm shumi

    LMAO, the lock jams and councillors freak out that they’re being robbed, hey it happens to all of us sometimes, doesn’t mean someone was trying to force entry. chill people! what are they hiding in there anyway that’s so special? Some people are such drama queens….time to calm that hyperactive imagination; plotting less deep into the night and sleeping would help!

    They should do what they were elected to do: work for their residents instead of writing fairy tales. did you by any chance check any of these cllrs timesheets? some haven’t filled any for years!


  6. on April 4, 2013 at 1:10 am imran

    BREAKING NEWS! They have found the CCTV footag of the break-in. The Mayor and Cllr Oli are seen leaving Josh’s office with a pencil sharpener, a box of staples and Josh’s old underpants which he keeps in his bottom draws.

    The Mayor’s gone from controlling the Met Police to breaking and entering in a week.


    • on April 4, 2013 at 9:40 am oldford1

      Comment of the week I think 🙂


  7. on April 4, 2013 at 9:51 am WHS

    Given his relentless focus on who fills in (non-statutory) timesheets, I’ll take it Shumi is Oli; given his clear knowledge of the layout of the Town Hall I’ll take it Oldford1 is Jedward, still astroturfing at the taxpayers’ expense and not studying at Selwyn…


  8. on April 4, 2013 at 2:48 pm Steve

    This Labour party is begining to sound like Conservitives Peter Golds, a person who cries ‘wolf’ everytime


    • on April 4, 2013 at 2:56 pm trialbyjeory

      Who was responsible for reporting Rob Marchant to the police for tweeting that he’d shoot himself if Lutfur was readmitted to the Labour party?


  9. on April 4, 2013 at 3:11 pm Kevin

    “An investigation has been completed and no conclusive evidence was found to confirm that a break-in had been attempted. The door was unopened but the lock could not be used and has now been replaced. We are currently considering options as to how security, in that particular part of the building, might be improved.”

    In other words there was no break-in! So Mr Peck with the help of TrialbyJeory have just traduced the good reputation of the Mayor and his colleagues.


    • on April 4, 2013 at 4:06 pm Tim

      Yeah. There was no evidence of vote-rigging either. So I’m quite sure that all is well in the sweet-smelling world of Tower Hamlets politics.


      • on April 4, 2013 at 5:43 pm imran

        Let me explain Tim.

        Allegations + investigation = conclusion. Conclusion = no case to answer
        THEREFORE allegation NOT True.

        Emphatic mathematical evidence. So stop going on about it!


      • on April 4, 2013 at 6:01 pm trialbyjeory

        So you’re not a mathematician then, Imran?

        I’ve no idea whether there was a break-in or not, but the fact there was no “conclusive evidence” does not mean the allegation is emphatically untrue.

        Have a look at the origins of Operation Weeting, Savile, Hillsborough and many other cases of failed investigations if you want emphatic evidence that the second part my previous sentence is true.


      • on April 4, 2013 at 6:18 pm Tim

        Funny – I saw Imran’s comment as being a dry and witty observation on the self-delusion of certain members of the LBTH political community. Self-delusion which is commented on here:

        https://trialbyjeory.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/election-fraud-ostriches-spotted-in-tower-hamlets/

        I mean, only a complete idiot would ever think that these allegations were “NOT true”, surely?


      • on April 4, 2013 at 9:20 pm imran

        I have a first class honors from the London School of Mathematistics in Hanbury street Ted. So don’t question my mathematistical intelligence.

        Not sure this is on the level of Savile or Hilsborough though. Even a great journalist like you couldn’t couldn’t stretch that far.


      • on April 4, 2013 at 9:58 pm imran

        @Tim, I’m nice but not dim!


  10. on April 4, 2013 at 6:06 pm Saint1976

    Imran I’m sure that despite your rhetorical flourish you do realise that it isn’t that simple. Not enough evidence to prosecute isn’t even close to being the same as not true. There’s something called a burden of proof.

    The ‘no case to answer’ came from the Dear Leader’s own press release rather than the police statement anyway, so you’re somewhat overstating the case.

    Trying to boil the criminal justice system into an equation is difficult enough, even without having your facts completely wrong.


    • on April 4, 2013 at 7:00 pm oldford1

      So are you advocating altering/doing away with the burden of proof?

      I always thought that actually needing evidence to substantiate allegations was quite a good quirk of the British justice system…funny that


      • on April 8, 2013 at 2:39 pm Saint1976

        No I’m just saying that running around shouting ‘innocent’ and ‘it’s not true’ is not factually correct. That isn’t what they said. I believe the statement never used the words ‘no case to answer’, that was the Dear Leader. As any first year law student will tell you, ‘not guilty’ is not the same as ‘innocent’.


  11. on April 5, 2013 at 1:21 pm Mr. Bloggy

    Reblogged this on Sundial Centre Shipton Street.


  12. on April 5, 2013 at 3:56 pm Kevin

    //the fact there was no “conclusive evidence” does not mean the allegation is emphatically untrue.

    Have a look at the origins of Operation Weeting, Savile, Hillsborough and many other cases of failed investigations if you want emphatic evidence that the second part my previous sentence is true//

    TrialbyJeory the investigation has revealed there was no concusive evidence to suggest an attempted break-in. What evidence do you have that there has been a cover up or are you just making wild allegations again? and will you be passing evidence of a cover up to the police etc?

    TrialbyJeoy I think your on a whitch hunt against the Mayor


  13. on April 5, 2013 at 4:02 pm Kevin

    All people in this country are innocent until proven guilty but according to TialbyJeory your guilty until proven innocent if your a muslim.


    • on April 5, 2013 at 4:10 pm trialbyjeory

      Now, now Kevin. What’s being a Muslim go to do with anything here?

      I can see we have emphatic and conclusive evidence that you can’t read properly. For you failed to spot the first part of the sentence you quoted:
      — I’ve no idea whether there was a break-in or not —-.

      Now go away and troll somewhere else–but best not do it while doing your job at Tower Hamlets Council, which is where your comment originates.


      • on April 5, 2013 at 8:35 pm imran

        So you check the IP addresses of everyone? Or just people you don’t agree with? Not good journalism Ted. If you want a diverse set of opinions let people speak. Don’t try and shut them up by comments like these. Very poor!


      • on April 5, 2013 at 9:01 pm trialbyjeory

        Only those who provide fake email addresses. And who play the race card gratuitously.

        By all means debate, but do please try to be at least a bit sensible.

        (And there are plenty of “diverse” opinions that I actually block, for v good reason.)


      • on April 6, 2013 at 9:27 am Grave Maurice

        Do you suppose Kevin’s his real name? I suspect a Kevin employed by the council might be proficient in English…



Comments are closed.

  • Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - London
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 6,448 other subscribers
  • Latest Tweets

    • I suppose they do both have a K in their surnames https://t.co/LMHjEr7EpF 9 hours ago
    • Also attended.Thought film was interesting,poetry reading by @slhesketh excellent (as was contribution from the cou… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
    • This all seems great and does seem a beacon in theory but who in Newham actually knows about this?? Zero from our c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
    Follow @tedjeory
  • Recent Comments

    taj on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Jay Kay on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Cllr Andrew Wood, Ca… on Election Day: an open thread 
    Abdul Hai on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
  • Archives

  • April 2013
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
    « Mar   May »
  • Blogroll

    • Blood and Property
    • Dave Hill's Guardian blog
    • David Osler
    • Designed for Life
    • Diamond Geezer
    • Ealing Rose
    • Emdad Rahman's Blog
    • Hackney Wick Blog
    • Harry's Place
    • Mayor Lutfur Rahman
    • Mile End Residents' Association
    • Richard Osley's blog
    • Spitalfields Life
    • The Bow Bell
    • The Londonist
    • Tower Hamlets – it's your money
    • Tower Hamlets Watch

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Join 752 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: