• Home
  • About
  • Comments policy
  • Contact
  • My fans

Trial by Jeory

Watching the world of east London politics

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Guest post: Tower Hamlets hustings for Assembly elections
Council tax used for free private language lessons in Bengali »

Guest post: Dan McCurry on Galloway and Labour

April 14, 2012 by trialbyjeory

This is a guest post by Dan McCurry, a former chair of Bow Labour. It first appeared on the New Statesman blog here but Dan has localised it for this site. (My personal view, for what it’s worth, is that there is a snowball in hell’s chance of Galloway returning to Labour: a) because Labour would never readmit him; and b) he wouldn’t want to anyway: far better to be the martyred rebel outsider.)

We know that George Galloway wants to return to Labour. The question is: does Labour want him back?

The tears and anguish in Bethnal Green & Bow in the early hours of 7th May 2005, when Oona King lost to George Galloway by 800 votes, were very different to the pale expressions of shock in Bradford, as Imran Hussein walked out of the count to disappear back into obscurity.  In east London, Galloway won by exploiting divisions.

In Bradford he won by offering entertainment, and stimulating a constituency where voters felt taken for granted.

At the time of Oona’s loss, I was chair of Bow Labour. I saw the Respect Party born through a coalition of Godless communists and religious fundamentalists. It was always doomed to division and that came in the council elections the following year.

I created the campaign slogan which was to became our mantra in Bow: “Vote for us, or you get Galloway!” The white working class obliged and the Lib Dems were wiped out in Bow. Respect did gain 11 council seats, but they were all Bangladeshi candidates, none of the SWP people were elected.

This was when Galloway started to complain about the tiresome village politics of the Bangladeshis. This is when he began to miss being a member of the Labour Party. From then on, he started to look around for some way, anyway, to get back into Labour, but every effort eluded him, until Bradford.

We never ignored George Galloway. If anything, he became our secret weapon. I wrote some copy for the party website which Jim subsequently used on all his election material. It portrayed Jim as surrounded on both sides by extremists with “George Galloway on his left promising to defend Islam, while on his right, tax exile Lord Ashcroft attempts to buy democracy with his millions”. It was Jim as the underdog. If he has to lose, then he’d go down fighting.

This is in stark contrast to the strategy in Bradford West. While we used the presence of George Galloway to our advantage, to motivate our supporters and get out and vote, they chose to ignore him as a has-been. It was a critical and lazy mistake.

Today, George doesn’t speak of rejoining Labour, but his actions do. He used to call for the death penalty for Tony Blair. Today, if he disagrees with Labour policy, he doesn’t make personal attacks. This isn’t just since the election, but during the election also. He is actively behaving himself.

The £200k salary from a sports radio slot doesn’t compare to the buzz of parliament. George doesn’t want that buzz to come to an end in May 2015, nor does he want the uncertainty and the hard work of trying to win somewhere else.

So what role could George Galloway have back in the Labour Party? There can be no question of George occupying a position in the Foreign Office. The salute to Saddam Hussein will never be forgotten. It’s difficult to imagine him occupying any ministry. The use for him is that he entertains us. Politics is often a boring subject. We hear the politicians make the same old arguments time and again. George fires things up. He is a character.

But do we really want the media to invite George onto TV panels as “The Labour bloke” at the expense of a senior Labour politician, especially when we don’t know what he’s going to say? He might be behaving himself now, but once he’s been accepted back into the party, there’s no saying what he’ll decide to do.

A return for George is more likely through real-politick than rational consideration. It is likely that this coalition will end with the Rat-Run Scenario. Once we get close to the election the Lib Dems will split along Labour/Tory lines and the government will survive on a wafer majority. We’ll be back to the days of sick MPs being brought in to vote on stretchers. At that point George Galloway becomes powerful, because he has a vote.

The problem with that idea is that Labour won’t leave it till so late to decide what to do about this seat. By the time the coalition runs for the hills, Bradford West will have a Labour candidate. If it’s not George then whoever it is will not step aside for anyone. So it’s unlikely that the national party will have anything much to do with it. It will be for the 400 members of Bradford West to decide. How will that play out?
Imran Hussein is unlikely to remain as candidate.

He made a fundamental mistake by ignoring Galloway and it’s unlikely that his party believe he can win in two years. A fresh face will be needed. The question is whether there is anyone who can take on Galloway and win this seat back. If it is the case that Imran Hussein was the best candidate that this constituency could produce, then George Galloway will be laughing.

Share this: Facebook & Twitter

  • Share
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

9 Responses

  1. on April 14, 2012 at 4:28 pm Newspaniard

    The next election should be very interesting. Labour is a spent force, it made such a cock-up of the country’s finances over the last ten years of its tenure that it can’t be trusted to run a lemonade stall. Conservatives have turned out to be a damp squib with Cameron turning out to be as big a religeot as Blair, looking to religious organisations, even the pope for advice as to how to run an increasingly secular country, let alone his forgotten promises on immigration. If the dissolusioned electorate does decide to vote it will be for minority parties and definitely not for the big 3.


  2. on April 15, 2012 at 12:01 pm Steve O'Driscoll

    Ted

    Why no article on Helal’s suspension?
    If Lutfur had been suspended you’d be having a field day!


    • on April 15, 2012 at 4:35 pm trialbyjeory

      I thought I had written about it at the time and I made my views known then. If he breached the code, then so be it. Forgive me if I don’t feel too much sympathy for the supposed victim in the affair, ie Hira Islam. He seems to be a council officer very much involved in the political system with influence that outweighs his pay grade.

      There is an abuse of the Standards Committee system happening at the moment and I will write about that soon.


  3. on April 15, 2012 at 3:19 pm Ben

    This is a ludicrous piece that speculates on the liklihood of the Gorgeous George returning to Labour as though it were a serious possibility. Ain’t gonna happen, thank God.

    Dan McCurry seems to be taking an apologist line on all the pro-Islamist “anti-Imperialist” renegades who have been chucked out these days. Doesn’t he keep saying nice things about Lutfur and how he should be let back in?! And McCurry is a man who was a big Oona loyalist in 2005 as far as I’m aware? What gives with this approach? I can hardly think it is popular in Tower Hamlets Labour where they have to face the wretched reality of this kind of aggressive communal politics all the time.


    • on April 15, 2012 at 5:05 pm danmccurry

      Wow, Ben Anonymous. You are getting excited!!!

      The only good thing I’ve said about Galloway is that he’s entertaining. He is. Does anyone wish to disagree with this?

      I do think Lutfur should be back in and Islamist or anti imperialist are words I’d use to describe him. Although he may well be renegade.

      I am friends with Oona.


      • on April 16, 2012 at 12:48 pm danmccurry

        Correction to above. “Islamist and anti-imperialist” are NOT words I’d use to describe him.


  4. on April 15, 2012 at 3:23 pm Tim

    NewSpaniard is close to the money; New Labour have been revealed as the traiters they always were; feathering their personal nests at the huge expensve of the country, whom they sold far down the river. The Tories haven’t covered themselves in glory, and the LibDems are deeply resentful of the role they have ended up with in the coalition (although if they had thought about it, they would have seen it coming.) The minority parties are going to hold a big part of the electorate in their grasp, for sure.

    It’ll be interesting to see how it works out, although I hope Dan McCurry is right and that the Tories do retain power; they remain the best choice for the country at the moment, weaknesses notwithstanding.

    One wonders how the result of the London Mayoral Election will be a harbinger of what is to come.

    Tim


  5. on April 16, 2012 at 12:13 pm John Terry

    “The white working class obliged and the Lib Dems were wiped out in Bow. Respect did gain 11 council seats, but they were all Bangladeshi candidates,”

    Of course they were all Bangladeshi candidates so they don’t count.

    Dan your post is filled with an astonishing amount of self-congratulation about a campaign you lost.


    • on April 16, 2012 at 12:47 pm danmccurry

      The point being that the SWP gained no traction with the electorate.
      The Labour Party held the council by one vote due to the 2 wards of Bow switching from Lib Dem to Labour. That is six councillors.
      The Lib Dems have never recovered.
      I think it’s safe to say that we won pretty convincingly. If it wasn’t for the split with Lutfur, then the Labour Party would dominate overwhelmingly.



Comments are closed.

  • Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - London
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 6,448 other subscribers
  • Latest Tweets

    • Also attended.Thought film was interesting,poetry reading by @slhesketh excellent (as was contribution from the cou… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 5 days ago
    • This all seems great and does seem a beacon in theory but who in Newham actually knows about this?? Zero from our c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
    • No lessons learned from last time, it seems. No residential streets or pavements gritted in my part of Canning Town… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
    Follow @tedjeory
  • Recent Comments

    taj on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Jay Kay on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Cllr Andrew Wood, Ca… on Election Day: an open thread 
    Abdul Hai on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
  • Archives

  • April 2012
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  
    « Mar   May »
  • Blogroll

    • Blood and Property
    • Dave Hill's Guardian blog
    • David Osler
    • Designed for Life
    • Diamond Geezer
    • Ealing Rose
    • Emdad Rahman's Blog
    • Hackney Wick Blog
    • Harry's Place
    • Mayor Lutfur Rahman
    • Mile End Residents' Association
    • Richard Osley's blog
    • Spitalfields Life
    • The Bow Bell
    • The Londonist
    • Tower Hamlets – it's your money
    • Tower Hamlets Watch

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Join 752 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: