• Home
  • About
  • Comments policy
  • Contact
  • My fans

Trial by Jeory

Watching the world of east London politics

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Lutfur’s criminal ally: he fails to condemn outright
Shelina Akhtar: Tory motion may be accepted »

Tory questions for next Tower Hamlets council meeting

January 14, 2012 by trialbyjeory

The Conservative group in Tower Hamlets has submitted the following motion to be debated at the next council meeting on January 25. (However, they fully expect council legal chief Isabella Freeman to block it even making the agenda.)

Motion on Cllr Shelina Aktar (AKA Shelina Akhtar)

Proposer: Cllr Peter Golds

Seconder: Cllr Tim Archer

This Council Notes:

  • That incidents of fraud and dishonesty in public life in the United Kingdom are relatively rare and that when proven both political parties and the relevant body, whether it be national or local take appropriate action, as was seen in the recent expenses scandal where all parties suspended recalcitrant members.
  • That Councillor Shelina Aktar, who as a matter of record altered the spelling of her name following her election to the council in 2010, was in July 2010 convicted of benefit fraud, under the name of Shelina Akhtar.
  • In January 2012 she pleaded guilty to further fraud and is to be sentenced in February 2012.

This Council Believes:

  • That it is wrong for such a person to vote on matters that would affect the lives and well being of the overwhelmingly law abiding citizens of this borough.
  • That according to time sheets and other information, that Cllr Aktar is a regular attendee of group meetings involving the Independent mayoral supporting members and regularly attends “mayoral engagements” including six hours of such engagements in December 2011.

This Council Resolves:

  • To suspend the membership of Cllr Aktar for this meeting and all other meetings until she is sentenced and further consideration of appropriate action can be made in light of the judicial sentence.
  • To call upon the Mayor to disassociate himself from Cllr Aktar and confirm publicly that she will not be invited to join him on further “mayoral engagements”.

For the record, the Tories have also submitted the following questions for the Members’ question time section:

Cllr Peter Golds

Does the Mayor support the government’s announcement that it will seek to criminalise sub-letting of socially rented property?

Cllr Zara Davis

Why has the Mayor ignored the motion agreed by Full Council in September 2011, which resolved that “Sir John McDougal Gardens, Millwall Park and Island Gardens will remain solely for the use of residents and community groups for the purposes of recreation, leisure and sports?”

Cllr David Snowdon

Will the Mayor please outline what measures he is taking to promote the teaching of history in Tower Hamlets schools?

Cllr Gloria Thienel

Considering the rising incidents of metal theft from public memorials; how many incidents of metal theft from a public memorial in Tower Hamlets has taken place in the last year, will the Mayor please inform the Council what measures he has taken to ensure that war memorials are protected in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets?

Cllr Craig Aston

Will the Mayor provide an update on energy efficiency in the Town Hall building?

Cllr Tim Archer

Will the Mayor provide an update on the progress of the motion agreed by full council on 15 September 2010, to bring the Henry Moore statue back to the borough and explain to the council  why this is taking so long, what meetings/discussions have taken place and will the statue be back in time for the Olympics?

Cllr Dr Emma Jones

How many people sacked from Tower Hamlets employment have accidentally continued to be paid in the past year?

The Tories have also submitted the following other motions:

Education in Tower Hamlets

Proposer: Cllr Zara Davis

Seconder: Cllr Dr Emma Jones

This Council notes:

  • That the Secretary of State for Education has recently approved the creation of three new free schools in Tower Hamlets which will be run by The Constable Education Trust, the Wapping and Shadwell Secondary Education Trust and City Gateway, all of which will open free schools in September 2012
  • That the severe shortage of school places in Tower Hamlets is such that:
    • According to the borough’s own projections, at primary school level an additional 16 form entries are required in Tower Hamlets primary schools between the academic year 2011/12 and 2012/13 to cope with the projected increase in population in the borough[1]
    • At secondary school level, the number of students will increase from 12,987 (2009/10 roll number) to 16,314 by 2020, thereby requiring an additional 110 form entries.[2]
    • It is already the case that for 301 children in Tower Hamlets, the nearest school available to them is so far away that the Council has to provide them with Home-School transport. [3]
    • The number of children requiring Home-School transport on distance grounds has trebled in the last two years, and it is forecasted to increase to 500 pupils in the next three years.[4]

This Council believes:

  • That giving schools independence helps to raise standards, as recognised by a recent OECD report which states: “where schools have greater autonomy over what is taught and how students are assessed, students tend to perform better”[5]
  • That free schools will therefore help to raise standards in Tower Hamlets, both in the free schools themselves as well as in neighbouring schools which will be spurred on to achieve higher standards
  • That free schools will increase the choice available to parents and pupils, with the three new free schools in Tower Hamlets going far beyond the National Curriculum, e.g. the Constable Education Trust Primary School with modern foreign languages; Wapping High will offer an extended school day with 34 hours of teaching a week and the opportunity for a variety of enrichment activities etc.
  • That free schools will also help to alleviate some of the pressure on school places in Tower Hamlets

Therefore, this Council resolves:

  • To welcome and support the creation of free schools in Tower Hamlets, which will be attended by hundreds of pupils from our borough
  • To actively co-operate with and support free schools on matters such as finding premises.

 

Troubled Families

Proposer: Cllr Tim Archer

Seconder: Cllr David Snowdon

This Council Notes:

  • The Coalition Government plans to deal with Troubled Families is a much welcomed step in the right direction.
  • Currently the government spends £9 billion a year on Troubled Families, with only £1 billion a year going to turning Troubled Families around.
  • Each Troubled Family costs £75,000 a year.
  • The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has 1,120 Troubled Families, the highest of any London Borough.
  • This means £84 million is spent each year on Troubled Families in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.

This Council Believes:

  •  The creation of a new Troubled Families team at the Department for Communities and Local Government.

This Council Resolves:

  • To support the setting up of a national network of Troubled Families ‘Trouble Shooters’.
  • To work with the Coalition government on this plan and to start to turn around the lives of London Borough of Tower Hamlets residents who live in Troubled Families.

Share this: Facebook & Twitter

  • Share
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

8 Responses

  1. on January 14, 2012 at 2:49 pm eastendersscriptwriterscouldn'tmakeitup

    Re Shalina Akhtar – the Tories might also ask the Mayor:

    (a) How much public (or council taxpayers) money has been spent [I would say ‘wasted’] on a bid for city status for Tower Hamlets; and
    (b) whether the Mayor considers that the continued presence of a convicted housing benefit fraudster as one of his councillors makes a positive contribution to any serious attempt to award city status to Tower Hamlets.

    Or words to that effect…

    (I shall reserve my comments on the remainder of the motions submitted for reasons of space)


    • on January 14, 2012 at 3:25 pm eastendersscriptwriterscouldn'tmakeitup

      Or maybe I will allow myself one comment which is to say that in the sudden urge to get Mayoral support for Tory Government policies (Peter Golds’ justifiable question) they might also ask whether the Mayor supports the measures introduced by the Conservative government through the Localism Bill [or is it an Act by now] that scrap the Standards Boards for local councils and allow (but do not make it mandatory) for local councils to draw up their own Codes of Conduct instead.

      Supplementary questions might include whether the Mayor intends to draw up a Code of Conduct for Tower Hamlets Council; and what standards the Mayor would want to see included in such a Code.

      But my main point is that the Tories can’t get away with being whiter than white because their government is scrapping the only effective method of dealing with Shalina Akhtar and leaving standards in the hands of people who have already failed to condemn her actions.

      PS If I am out of date on the Localism Bill/Act then I apologise – it may have been amended significantly (and I sincerely hope it has) since I last had to look at it a few months ago.


      • on January 15, 2012 at 11:14 am You couldn't make it up!

        The Council has got a Code of Conduct – it’s Part V of the formal Constitution.

        The Council currently seem to be ignoring it in failing to take any action to date to investigate Cllr Shelina Aktar

        IMO It would have appropriate to ask for the Standards Committee to outline what action it has taken to date to investigate this Councillor – and if it has not acted, what are the reasons for not acting.


  2. on January 14, 2012 at 3:22 pm pwei34

    Great that the Conservatives on Tower Hamlets Council are addressing the questions that actually effect ordinary people even if no one else is.


  3. on January 16, 2012 at 2:59 pm STEVE O'DRISCOLL

    What is Cllr Golds’ opinion of an extremely similar scenario at the heart of David Cameron’s government – in which it is brutally clear that his Energy Secretary, Chris Huhne MP, committed fraud by dishonestly passing points on his driving license on to his wife – who would have had to break the laws of physics to be in the driving seat given that she has an alibi! – and subsequently lied repeatedly to the British public about the event?

    I hear from friends in knowledgable circles that Mr Huhne is now very likely to be facing a spell behind bars himself.

    Same old Tories. Get your own glass house in order before throwing stones!


    • on January 17, 2012 at 1:48 am You couldn't make it up!

      I wouldn’t disagree with the point you’re making about Chris Huhne – apart from highlighting that Huhne is a LibDem even if he is part of the coalition government!

      However I’m sure we would all agree that there are politicians of all parties who let their colleagues and their parties down badly after being caught out and convicted following their lies and deceit – even if some choose to describe them as “mistakes”.

      One who springs to mind is Lord Hanningfield, the former Tory Leader of Essex County Council, who was forced to resign from political office and went to prison for fraudulently claiming £14,200 in expenses
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15940286

      It just goes to show that NOBODY is exempt from the rule of law………


  4. on January 16, 2012 at 10:32 pm Shelina Akhtar: Tory motion may be accepted « Trial by Jeory

    […] Comments « Tory questions for next Tower Hamlets council meeting […]


  5. on January 17, 2012 at 2:24 pm GarYj

    “It just goes to show that NOBODY is exempt from the rule of law”

    Except Baroness Uddin who remains at liberty despite her six figure expenses swindle.



Comments are closed.

  • Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - London
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 6,448 other subscribers
  • Latest Tweets

    • I suppose they do both have a K in their surnames https://t.co/LMHjEr7EpF 1 day ago
    • Also attended.Thought film was interesting,poetry reading by @slhesketh excellent (as was contribution from the cou… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
    • This all seems great and does seem a beacon in theory but who in Newham actually knows about this?? Zero from our c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
    Follow @tedjeory
  • Recent Comments

    taj on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Jay Kay on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Cllr Andrew Wood, Ca… on Election Day: an open thread 
    Abdul Hai on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
  • Archives

  • January 2012
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
    « Dec   Feb »
  • Blogroll

    • Blood and Property
    • Dave Hill's Guardian blog
    • David Osler
    • Designed for Life
    • Diamond Geezer
    • Ealing Rose
    • Emdad Rahman's Blog
    • Hackney Wick Blog
    • Harry's Place
    • Mayor Lutfur Rahman
    • Mile End Residents' Association
    • Richard Osley's blog
    • Spitalfields Life
    • The Bow Bell
    • The Londonist
    • Tower Hamlets – it's your money
    • Tower Hamlets Watch

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Join 752 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: