• Home
  • About
  • Comments policy
  • Contact
  • My fans

Trial by Jeory

Watching the world of east London politics

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Labour group questions for next full council meeting (including one on fraud in politics)
Labour motion calls for ban on advertising of payday lenders on town hall properties and in East End Life »

Labour motion on rip-off service charges to leaseholders by Tower Hamlets Homes

November 21, 2013 by trialbyjeory

This motion has been submitted by the Labour group for debate at next Wednesday’s full meeting of Tower Hamlets council (declaration: I’m a Tower Hamlets Homes leaseholder).

Proposer: Cllr Marc Francis

Seconder: Cllr Carlo Gibbs

This Council notes:

  • In 2008, Full Council agreed a motion authorising the Lead Member for Housing to commission an independent audit of leasehold service charges following concerns about the two-thirds increase in the level of Management & Administration fees, numerous historic disputes over the costs recharged and a Scrutiny Review which called for much greater transparency and accountability in the calculation of service charges;
  • In 2009, a Project Steering Group (PSG) involving councillors, Tower Hamlets Homes (THH), Tower Hamlets Leaseholders Association (THLA) and other leaseholders agreed detailed Terms of Reference for that audit, commissioned Beevers & Struthers Ltd to carry it out;
  • In spring 2010, THH attempted unilaterally to introduce new methodology for the calculation of management fees and a new policy to charge to ground floor leaseholders for services they did not benefit from, which was blocked by the Lead Member;
  • In summer 2010 a draft version was produced for the PSG, identifying a series of very challenging issues for THH around the management of leasehold services, value for money, caretaking, repairs and maintenance, management and administration fees, and several Service Levels Agreements with LBTH;
  • However, publication of the final audit report was delayed by the Mayoral Election in October 2010 and not finally signed off by the PSG until May 2011, by which time LBTH/THH had already begun consultation on a “Leasehold Policy Review” which was claimed to have been based on its findings;
  • The Mayor and Lead Member subsequently established a Leasehold Action Plan Working Group (LAPWG), including representatives of leaseholders to bring together the Beevers & Struthers’ recommendations, those of the Audit Commission and THH’s own Leaseholder Service Improvement Group, and a Statement of Intent was agreed by all those involved to implement the 54 recommendations or agree an alternative remedy;
  • Over the next 18 months, just five of the 54 recommendations were implemented and in October 2012, THH sent leaseholders “actuals”, which included significantly increased charges in most areas, particularly block/estate cleaning, a 17 per cent “Overhead” fee and new SLAs with LBTH.  They were told these costs had been calculated on the B&S audit and had actually been “dampened” and so would increase further over the next two years;
  • In spring 2013, the St Stephen’s Estate Leaseholders Association published a damning scrutiny report, which exposed the failure to implement the recommendations in the original Beevers& Struthers audit;
  • In response, the current Lead Member for Housing & Development, is now proposing an “review” of the original B&S audit.

This Council believes:

  • The Mayor and THH have not implemented the recommendations contained in the independent audit in accordance with the agreed Statement of Intent and that the original aim of increasing transparency and accountability has been lost;
  • Leaseholders should be fully recharged for the costs of the services they receive, but that the 2011/12 “actuals” are not based on the methodology set out in the recommendations in the B&S audit, but are instead opaque and represent very poor value for money;

This Council resolves to call on the Mayor to:

  • Explain why only 5 out of 54 of the recommendations in the B&S audit have so far been implemented;
  • Explain why an 17 per cent “Overhead” has been introduced across most Heads of Charge:
  • Justify the Service Level Agreements between LBTH and THH and explain what action is being taken to ensure best value;
  • Instruct THH to publish a report detailing how the actions it has taken since October 2010 to achieve “savings” have resulted in reduced costs to council leaseholders and tenants.

Share this: Facebook & Twitter

  • Share
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ALMO, carlo gibbs, leaseholders, management and admin charges, marc francis, service charges, tower hamlets council, tower hamlets homes | 4 Comments

4 Responses

  1. on November 21, 2013 at 11:12 am stewart rayment

    Aren’t most of these rip-off lease-holders the so called social landlords that Labour betrayed the council’s housing stock to?


  2. on November 21, 2013 at 12:58 pm Ray Gipson

    I attended the the SELA leaseholder meeting last night. I am so pleased I did. What I heard from disgruntled leaseholders has not changed in all the years I have been a leaseholder ( since 1984). The one thing we must do is stand together. Ray Gipson Hewison St. Leaseholders Assoc.


  3. on November 22, 2013 at 3:45 am Curious cat

    Excellent motion for debate.

    Its about time the Mayor’s successes, policies and performance were closely examined ….. oh and the Mayor’s failures and omissions too.

    Curious Cat


  4. on November 22, 2013 at 12:28 pm Frank Muldoon

    LBTH like most Council’s operates a system known as Block Accounting to levy leasehold service charges. The result of using such a system is that the charge levied usually bears little relationship to the expenditure on any given dwelling or block, it relates only to expenditure in the relevant Housing area. It would appear to be in breach of the usual individual Right to Buy lease which specifies the area in which a service charge can be incurred.

    Operating a system likes this allows the service charge provider the oppurtunity, should they choose, to cross subsidise one element of its housing stock with service charge income received from another. If a private landlord did that he would probably end up in court.

    Cheed



Comments are closed.

  • Ebuzzing - Top Blogs - London
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 6,450 other followers

  • Latest Tweets

    • This extract is one in which Doherty moans about Paul Roundhill tipping off the press about Kate Moss allegedly sno… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
    • Wondering if Guardian paid Doherty for this extract from his new book. Looking forward to the next in which he expl… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
    • Haha, great turn of phrase from Mark >> Instead Rahman seems to think – or whatever the idiot with room temperatur… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
    Follow @tedjeory
  • Recent Comments

    taj on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Jay Kay on Election Day: an open thread 
    Curious Cat on Election Day: an open thread 
    Cllr Andrew Wood, Ca… on Election Day: an open thread 
    Abdul Hai on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
    Stewart Rayment on Election Day: an open thread 
  • Archives

  • November 2013
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
    « Oct   Dec »
  • Blogroll

    • Blood and Property
    • Dave Hill's Guardian blog
    • David Osler
    • Designed for Life
    • Diamond Geezer
    • Ealing Rose
    • Emdad Rahman's Blog
    • Hackney Wick Blog
    • Harry's Place
    • Mayor Lutfur Rahman
    • Mile End Residents' Association
    • Richard Osley's blog
    • Spitalfields Life
    • The Bow Bell
    • The Londonist
    • Tower Hamlets – it's your money
    • Tower Hamlets Watch

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Join 6,450 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Trial by Jeory
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: